In the evolving landscape of digital finance, confusion often arises around the roles different assets play—especially when it comes to XRP and stablecoins. A recent post from Britto, a community advocate for Arthur Britto, co-creator of the XRP Ledger (XRPL), sheds light on a widespread misconception: that stablecoins are replacing XRP. This idea, as Britto explains, stems from a fundamental misunderstanding of what each asset is designed to do.
"Stablecoins are replacing XRP!"
That's like saying Google Maps replaced Wi-Fi. You're confusing the app with the infrastructure.
This analogy cuts to the core of the issue. Just as Wi-Fi provides the connectivity that apps like Google Maps rely on, XRP serves as foundational infrastructure within the blockchain ecosystem—while stablecoins function more like applications built on top of that infrastructure.
Understanding the Core Functions: XRP vs. Stablecoins
At their essence, XRP and stablecoins serve entirely different purposes in the world of digital finance. Recognizing this distinction is crucial for anyone navigating cryptocurrency markets or building blockchain-based financial solutions.
XRP: The Bridge Currency
XRP is engineered for speed, scalability, and interoperability. It operates as a bridge currency within the XRP Ledger (XRPL), enabling near-instant settlement of cross-border transactions across disparate financial systems. Its primary value lies not in price stability but in its ability to move value efficiently between currencies—be it USD to EUR, JPY to MXN, or even emerging market fiat pairs.
Think of XRP as an international translator in a global financial network. When two parties using different currencies need to transact, XRP steps in as an intermediary asset that both can accept and convert quickly, minimizing delays and reducing liquidity costs.
Stablecoins: Digital Fiat with Stability
On the other hand, stablecoins such as USDC or USDT are digital representations of traditional fiat currencies, pegged 1:1 to assets like the U.S. dollar. Their main purpose is to offer price stability and serve as a reliable store of value within volatile crypto ecosystems.
While they excel at preserving value and enabling stable trading pairs, they are not inherently designed for cross-chain or cross-border efficiency. They depend heavily on centralized issuers, regulated banking relationships, and pre-established liquidity pools—factors that can introduce friction in international settlements.
Real-World Use Case: Cross-Border Payments
To illustrate the practical differences, consider a real-world scenario: a Japanese bank needs to send $10 million to a financial institution in Mexico.
Using stablecoins like USDC might seem straightforward at first glance—but the process isn’t as simple as it appears. The sender must:
- Ensure both institutions support USDC.
- Find liquidity providers in both jurisdictions.
- Navigate compliance checks and foreign exchange regulations.
- Bear counterparty risk due to reliance on centralized custodians.
This results in added complexity, time delays, and potential cost overruns.
Now contrast this with using XRP via Ripple’s On-Demand Liquidity (ODL) solution:
- The Japanese bank converts yen into XRP instantly.
- XRP is transmitted across the XRPL in under 4 seconds.
- The receiving end in Mexico converts XRP into Mexican pesos—automatically and without pre-funded accounts.
No need for nostro/vostro accounts, no idle capital sitting overseas, and minimal transaction fees. This showcases XRP’s true utility: on-demand liquidity for cross-border transfers.
Liquidity and Decentralization: Why Infrastructure Matters
One of the most critical factors in global finance isn’t stability—it’s liquidity. The ability to convert assets quickly and cheaply across borders determines how efficient a payment system really is.
The Liquidity Challenge with Stablecoins
Stablecoins require localized liquidity pairs. For example, moving USD to PHP (Philippine pesos) means finding a market where USDC/PHP is actively traded. If that pair lacks depth, slippage increases and execution suffers. Moreover, because most stablecoins are issued and managed by centralized entities, they carry inherent risks:
- Funds can be frozen.
- Addresses can be blacklisted.
- Regulatory crackdowns may disrupt availability.
These limitations make them less ideal for unrestricted, peer-to-peer value transfer across borders.
XRP’s Decentralized Advantage
XRP runs on the decentralized XRP Ledger, which operates independently of any single entity. Transactions are validated by a distributed network of nodes, reducing counterparty risk and censorship potential. Because XRP is natively integrated into the ledger, it enables trustless, instant conversions without relying on third-party custodians.
This decentralized architecture supports global scalability, making it particularly suitable for institutions seeking resilient, low-cost remittance channels.
Ripple’s Multi-Asset Strategy: Complementarity Over Competition
An important point clarified in Britto’s post is that XRP and stablecoins are not rivals—they’re complementary tools.
Ripple’s own launch of RLUSD, a U.S. dollar-backed stablecoin, underscores this philosophy. Rather than replacing XRP, RLUSD expands Ripple’s toolkit for enterprise clients. It allows institutions to digitize fiat obligations while still leveraging XRP for cross-border settlements.
Britto likens this strategy to having both a hammer and a screwdriver in your toolbox—each tool has its function. Similarly:
- Use stablecoins when you need price stability and on-chain representation of fiat.
- Use XRP when you need fast, low-cost international settlements with minimal liquidity overhead.
The future of digital finance isn’t about choosing one over the other—it’s about using the right asset for the right job.
👉 See how multi-asset strategies are shaping the future of institutional crypto adoption.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Q: Can stablecoins fully replace XRP in cross-border payments?
No. While stablecoins offer stability, they lack the native speed, decentralization, and liquidity-on-demand features that make XRP effective for international settlements. They also depend on pre-existing liquidity pools and centralized oversight.
Q: Is XRP a stablecoin?
No. XRP is not a stablecoin. It is a digital asset designed for fast settlement and interoperability across currencies. Unlike stablecoins, its value fluctuates based on market demand.
Q: Does Ripple’s launch of RLUSD mean XRP is being phased out?
Absolutely not. RLUSD is intended to complement XRP by offering a stable digital dollar option within Ripple’s ecosystem. Both assets serve distinct roles—XRP for transfer efficiency, RLUSD for value stability.
Q: Why is decentralization important in global payments?
Decentralization reduces reliance on single points of failure or control. In cross-border finance, it minimizes counterparty risk, avoids censorship, and increases system resilience—key advantages XRP holds over centralized stablecoin models.
Q: How fast are XRP transactions?
XRP transactions settle in 3 to 5 seconds, with extremely low fees (typically less than $0.01). This makes it one of the fastest and most cost-effective digital assets for international transfers.
Q: Are stablecoins risky?
Yes—they carry risks related to issuer solvency, regulatory scrutiny, and custodial control. Some have experienced de-pegging events or sudden freezes, highlighting their dependence on centralized entities.
Final Thoughts: Right Tool for the Right Job
The narrative that “stablecoins are replacing XRP” reflects a shallow understanding of digital asset architecture. As Britto aptly puts it: confusing stablecoins with XRP is like confusing an app with the internet itself.
Digital finance doesn’t operate on binaries. The most effective systems integrate multiple assets—each serving unique functions within a broader ecosystem. Stablecoins preserve value; XRP moves it.
As financial institutions increasingly adopt blockchain technology, the demand for both stable digital fiat and efficient bridge currencies will grow—not diminish. The key lies in recognizing their distinct roles and deploying them strategically.
Whether you're an investor, developer, or financial professional, understanding these nuances empowers smarter decisions in an increasingly complex digital economy.
👉 Explore the tools powering next-generation finance—start with understanding bridge currencies today.