The 12th Ethereum Foundation AMA, held on September 5, 2024, via Twitter Spaces, offered a rare opportunity for the community to hear directly from core developers and leaders like Vitalik Buterin, Justin Drake, and Dankrad Feist. With ETH’s market performance lagging behind broader crypto trends, investors and users alike are seeking clarity on Ethereum’s long-term vision, value proposition, and scalability roadmap. This article distills key insights from the session, analyzes critical concerns about ETH’s price stagnation, and explores how the ecosystem plans to respond.
Ethereum’s Scalability: Beyond Layer 2 Reliance
A central theme of the AMA was Ethereum’s approach to scaling. Many in the community assume that Ethereum is fully offloading scalability to Layer 2 (L2) solutions. However, both Justin Drake and Vitalik emphasized that Ethereum is actively enhancing Layer 1 (L1) capabilities in parallel with L2 growth.
Key L1 improvements under exploration include:
- Precompiles for VM execution – Optimizing core operations at the protocol level.
- ZK-based proof acceleration – Speeding up zero-knowledge proof verification to reduce overhead.
- Verkle trees – Replacing Merkle Patricia trees to reduce node storage requirements and improve light client efficiency.
Dankrad clarified that L1 and L2 scaling are not mutually exclusive—they are complementary. While L2s handle transaction volume, L1 continues evolving to support them more efficiently, particularly in terms of data availability (DA).
👉 Discover how next-gen blockchain scalability is redefining performance and accessibility.
Why Is ETH Underperforming? Addressing the Elephant in the Room
One of the most anticipated questions: Why has ETH underperformed despite Ethereum’s dominance in DeFi, NFTs, and institutional adoption?
Justin Drake responded decisively: “ETH is money.” He argued that ETH’s appreciation is not just desirable—it’s essential for Ethereum’s long-term success. He outlined three pillars supporting ETH’s intrinsic value:
- Economic bandwidth – The capacity to securely host trillions in decentralized stablecoins and financial instruments.
- Economic security – Staking provides robust, cryptoeconomic protection against attacks; higher ETH value means stronger network security.
- Economic vitality – The ability to attract top developers, institutions, and innovators who drive ecosystem growth.
These factors form a feedback loop: stronger fundamentals → increased adoption → higher demand for ETH → greater security and utility.
Do Layer 2s Drain Value From Ethereum?
A widespread concern is that L2s might “hijack” transaction fees and MEV (Maximal Extractable Value), weakening Ethereum’s revenue model. Dankrad Feist pushed back on this narrative.
He explained that L2s do not extract value—they extend it. High-value transactions (e.g., large settlements, cross-chain bridges, staking operations) will remain on L1. L2s serve as scalability engines, relying on Ethereum for data availability and finality. In return, Ethereum becomes a settlement and coordination layer—more valuable as a foundational platform.
Justin added a crucial perspective:
“Don’t focus on per-transaction fees. Focus on total economic throughput.”
His vision? 10 million transactions per second across the stack. Even at minimal fees, that volume could generate over $1 billion in daily revenue for Ethereum. The bottleneck today isn’t fee size—it’s insufficient application-layer demand.
👉 See how high-throughput blockchain ecosystems are shaping the future of finance.
The Real Challenge: Application-Layer Innovation
Despite technical progress, the AMA revealed a troubling gap: lack of compelling application-layer innovation.
While infrastructure improves, end-user applications have stagnated. Most DeFi protocols are iterative forks; NFTs lack utility beyond speculation; and real-world asset (RWA) tokenization remains niche. This stagnation limits transaction volume and economic activity—directly impacting ETH demand.
Vitalik acknowledged this indirectly, emphasizing Ethereum’s strengths:
- Superior data availability (DA) for rollups.
- Stronger decentralization under PoS compared to PoW chains.
- A resilient community, culture, and shared values.
Yet, many found his response vague. Technical superiority alone won’t drive mass adoption without killer applications.
Ethereum Foundation’s Financial Health and Governance
Another revealing point: the Ethereum Foundation (EF) spends about $100 million annually** and holds roughly **$650 million in reserves, mostly in ETH.
This creates a natural alignment:
The EF has a vested interest in ETH’s price appreciation—its operational sustainability depends on it.
With over 300 people involved (though not all are full-time employees), questions arise about organizational efficiency. Critics argue the structure may be bloated, with too many researchers and too few builders shipping production-grade tools.
Still, the EF continues funding critical research in cryptography, consensus mechanisms, and privacy—areas that underpin Ethereum’s long-term edge.
FAQs: Addressing Community Concerns
Q: Is Ethereum becoming too reliant on Layer 2s?
A: No. While L2s handle scalability, Ethereum L1 is evolving with upgrades like Verkle trees and ZK-friendly precompiles. The relationship is symbiotic—not parasitic.
Q: Can ETH ever achieve strong price growth without higher fees?
A: Yes. Value comes from total economic activity, not per-transaction fees. High throughput—even at low fees—can generate massive aggregate revenue if demand exists.
Q: Why isn’t there more innovation in dApps?
A: The ecosystem prioritized infrastructure first. Now, with scaling solved (or nearing solution), the focus must shift to user-centric applications—gaming, social, identity, RWAs.
Q: Is PoS less secure than PoW?
A: Vitalik argues PoS is more secure due to higher decentralization potential and lower energy costs. Slashing conditions and cryptoeconomic incentives protect against attacks more effectively than PoW’s energy-based security.
Q: Will Ethereum ever move away from being “slow and expensive”?
A: For direct L1 use, yes—it will remain costly for most users. But with L2s abstracting complexity and cost, end-users won’t interact with L1 directly. Ethereum aims to be the secure backend of Web3.
Q: How does ETH derive value if most transactions happen off-chain?
A: Through settlement finality, data availability, and staking demand. Even off-chain transactions ultimately rely on Ethereum’s security—paid for in ETH.
Final Thoughts: The Path Forward for Ethereum
The AMA left many wanting more concrete action plans. While technical progress continues, the ecosystem faces a crisis of momentum. To reignite excitement and drive ETH valuation:
- Boost application-layer innovation: Fund real-world use cases beyond DeFi clones.
- Improve developer experience: Simplify tooling for building on L2s and interacting with L1.
- Clarify the ETH value accrual model: Communicate clearly how staking, burning, and usage drive scarcity.
- Engage the community with bold vision: Beyond tech specs—what kind of world does Ethereum want to build?
Ethereum remains the most robust smart contract platform with unmatched security and decentralization. But technology alone won’t win the future. It needs narrative, utility, and urgency.
👉 Explore how Ethereum’s evolution could redefine digital ownership and finance.
Core Keywords: Ethereum, ETH price, Layer 2 scaling, data availability, economic security, blockchain scalability, application-layer innovation, PoS security