The debate over the future of decentralized wallets has reignited, sparked by Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin’s recent commentary on Multi-Party Computation (MPC) wallets. At the heart of the discussion lies a critical question: Are MPC-based keyless wallets or on-chain smart contract wallets the superior solution for securing digital assets in Web3?
As the gateway to blockchain ecosystems, decentralized wallets play a foundational role in user onboarding, security, and overall experience. With rising mainstream interest in crypto, the demand for secure, user-friendly, and interoperable wallet solutions has never been higher.
Vitalik’s argument centered on a perceived fundamental flaw in MPC-based Externally Owned Accounts (EOAs): the inability to revoke compromised key shares. He asserted that even after re-sharing secret shares, old fragments could still reconstruct the original private key—making true revocation impossible. In contrast, smart contract wallets, powered by Account Abstraction (AA), can programmatically update access rules, effectively invalidating old keys through logic enforcement.
This claim ignited a wave of responses from industry leaders—including teams from Coinbase, SlowMist, Sinohope, Cobo, and ZenGo—offering nuanced perspectives that challenge a binary view of this technological divide.
Understanding the Core Technologies
Before diving into the debate, it's essential to clarify what each technology offers.
MPC Wallets: Distributed Trust, No Single Point of Failure
Multi-Party Computation (MPC) enables private key operations—like signing transactions—without ever reconstructing the full key. Instead, cryptographic shares are distributed across multiple devices or parties. Only when a threshold of shares collaborates can a valid signature be generated.
This approach eliminates the single point of failure inherent in traditional EOA wallets. Even if one device is compromised, attackers cannot access the full key.
👉 Discover how next-gen wallets are redefining security with advanced cryptographic techniques.
Smart Contract Wallets: Programmable Control & Enhanced UX
Smart contract wallets operate as self-custodial accounts governed by code rather than private keys. Enabled by EIP-4337 and Account Abstraction, these wallets allow features like:
- Paying gas in any ERC-20 token
- Batched transactions (e.g., approve + swap in one click)
- Social recovery and time-locked transfers
- Session keys for dApp interactions
Because logic resides on-chain, permissions can be updated dynamically—effectively "revoking" old signing keys by no longer recognizing them in the contract’s validation rules.
Industry Voices: Beyond the Binary Debate
Rather than choosing sides, many experts emphasize complementarity over competition.
Safeheron: Context Matters in Key Revocation
Kane Wang, Partner and Tech VP at Safeheron, acknowledges Vitalik’s technical point but argues it’s context-dependent. While MPC doesn’t support cryptographic revocation of old shares post-re-sharing, this limitation doesn’t negate its value.
“MPC excels in cross-chain asset management and multi-device security. It solves real-world problems around key storage and operational risk. The goal isn’t to mimic smart contracts but to enhance trust-minimized key handling.”
He also highlights emerging hybrid models where MPC secures the signing process within an AA framework—blending chain-off computation with chain-on control.
New Fire Tech: User Needs Trump Ideology
Kevin He, Technical VP at New Fire Technology (Sinohope), stresses that technology should serve users—not ideological purity.
“True decentralization is important, but so is usability. MPC + TEE (Trusted Execution Environment) delivers strong security with low cost and broad chain support. For mass adoption, that balance matters more than theoretical perfection.”
He advocates for MPC + AA convergence, where MPC secures the root signing key of an AA wallet—solving the EOA control problem while retaining programmability.
SlowMist: Focus on Risk Reduction, Not Perfection
Cosine, founder of SlowMist, agrees that MPC doesn’t offer cryptographic revocation—but argues that’s not its primary purpose.
“MPC removes single points of failure and works across chains. That alone creates massive value. Let’s not dismiss practical progress because it doesn’t meet abstract ideals.”
He envisions a future where different technologies coexist and integrate—EOAs improved by MPC, smart contracts enhanced by off-chain computation.
ZenGo: Cross-Chain Reality Can't Be Ignored
Ouriel Ohayon, CEO of ZenGo, points out a major limitation of smart contract wallets: they only work on chains supporting smart contracts.
“Bitcoin, Dogecoin, Solana (pre-2023), and many others can’t natively support AA wallets. MPC fills this gap with universal compatibility.”
Additionally, he notes that high Ethereum L1 gas fees make deploying or recovering AA wallets costly—sometimes over $40 per recovery—making them impractical for average users.
Bitizen Wallet: The Magic of "No Key"
Winson, founder of Bitizen Wallet, celebrates MPC’s core innovation: the private key never exists in one place.
“MPC doesn’t store or transmit the key—it computes signatures using distributed fragments. This fundamentally changes the attack surface.”
This makes phishing and malware attacks far less effective, especially when combined with secure enclaves or hardware isolation.
Desig Labs & Extreme Quorum: Hybrid Is the Future
For organizational use cases—like validator nodes sharing a wallet—Vitalik’s concern about irreversibility after node removal holds weight. However, solutions like Extreme Quorum are exploring ways to combine dynamic node management with MPC protocols.
Desig Labs concludes:
“The best path forward isn’t choosing between MPC and AA—it’s combining both to deliver seamless, secure experiences.”
Comparative Advantages: Where Each Shines
Why MPC Stands Out
- Cross-chain compatibility: Works on any blockchain, including non-EVM and UTXO-based chains like Bitcoin.
- Lower transaction costs: Multi-signature logic happens off-chain; only one on-chain transaction is needed.
- Enhanced privacy: No on-chain trace of signers or approval counts.
- Reduced user friction: No need to manage gas tokens or interact with complex contract deployments.
Why Smart Contract Wallets Excel
- Programmability: Supports recurring payments, spending limits, and automated investment strategies (e.g., SIP-style buying).
- Gas abstraction: Users pay fees in any token; sponsors can cover gas for others.
- Modular extensibility: Developers can build plug-in modules for DAO voting, lending integrations, etc.
- Transparent accountability: On-chain logs show exactly which keys approved a transaction—critical for audits.
👉 Explore platforms integrating MPC and AA for enterprise-grade custody solutions.
The Emerging Consensus: Fusion Over Fragmentation
Despite initial polarization, a clear consensus is forming among industry veterans:
MPC and smart contract wallets are not rivals—they are complementary layers in a maturing Web3 infrastructure stack.
Cobo CEO Shen Yu predicts:
“With Layer 2 rollups natively supporting AA wallets as default accounts, we’ll see mass adoption accelerate. But MPC will remain crucial for securing those accounts behind the scenes.”
He expects widespread integration by Q2 2025, driven by improved scalability and reduced user friction.
Abraham, CEO of TholosApp, adds:
“Smart contract wallets have limitations—high cost, EVM-only support, poor dApp compatibility. But so do MPC wallets. The real breakthrough comes when we merge their strengths.”
Keywords Mined & Integrated
- MPC wallets
- smart contract wallets
- Account Abstraction (AA)
- private key security
- cross-chain compatibility
- decentralized wallet
- EIP-4337
- keyless wallet
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Q: Can MPC wallets truly revoke access like smart contract wallets?
A: Not cryptographically. Old key shares remain valid after re-sharing. However, access can be practically revoked through policy enforcement and device rotation.
Q: Are smart contract wallets only available on Ethereum?
A: Currently, most are built on EVM-compatible chains due to EIP-4337 support. However, similar concepts are being explored on other platforms like Solana and Bitcoin via layer-2 extensions.
Q: Is MPC safer than traditional private keys?
A: Yes. By eliminating a single point of failure and preventing full key exposure, MPC significantly reduces risks from theft, loss, and phishing.
Q: Do I need ETH to pay gas with a smart contract wallet?
A: No. One major advantage of AA wallets is gas abstraction, allowing users to pay fees in any supported token—even sponsored by third parties.
Q: Can MPC work with hardware wallets?
A: Absolutely. Many MPC implementations integrate with secure elements or hardware modules to further harden protection against malware.
Q: Will MPC and AA converge in the future?
A: Industry leaders widely believe so. Combining MPC’s secure signing with AA’s programmable logic creates a powerful hybrid model ideal for both retail and institutional users.
👉 See how leading platforms are implementing MPC+AA architectures for next-generation custody.